How did the law regulate custody before?

Under the past regulations – up until the 31st December 2021 – in case the parents did not come to an agreement, the court could only decide on parental custody for the benefit of one parent, even if after careful examination of the circumstances it became clear that joint exercise of parental custody would have been beneficial for the physical, mental and spiritual growth of the child.

Joint exercise of parental custody could only be decided at the request of both parents. In the event that one of the parents objected to joint parental custody, the other parent – who did not exercise parental custody – has usually been relegated to the background in making the decisions regarding the child. The only exceptions to this rule have been the major decisions regarding the child, which remained to be decided jointly by both parents.

What is alternate custody and what does it have to do with joint parental custody?

Alternate custody is not unknown in judicial practice, although it has not yet received a legal background before. Based on the agreement of the parents, parental supervision and contact arrangements have already been arranged in this way before, but the concept has now been clarified and enacted with the new amendment. Alternate custody means that the parents are jointly obligated and entitled to exercise parental responsibility for the same period of time, so they spend exactly the same amount of time with the child. Under alternate custody for example, the child spends one week at his/her mother, and then one week at his/her father. In case one of the parents gets to spend more time with the child – for example where the child spends two weeks at his/her mother and only one week at his/her father – that is no longer considered alternate custody.

According to the relevant laws, in case of joint exercise of parental custody, the court has to decide where the child is going to live, which address must match that of one of his/her parents. The court also has to decide on the time of contact arrangements – which include among others the time and place where the contacting parent can meet the child, contact during holidays, and child support.

It is also important to note that alternate custody is not a direct consequence of joint exercise of parental custody. Alternate custody thus remains as a mere opportunity, which may be decided by the court ex officio, if the court decides that it is in the interest of the child. Joint exercise of parental custody is the basis of alternate custody. Joint exercise of parental custody only means that the parents are obligated and entitled to exercise parental responsibility in equal measures, but this does not necessarily translate to equal amount of time spent with the child, which can shift in favor of one of the parents.

Which circumstances does the court take into account when making its decision?

The court must examine all the relevant circumstances before making its decision regarding the custody. According to the relevant laws the court must take into account especially: testimonies of witnesses, experts’ opinions, pedagogical opinions and environmental studies. In case of alternate care it is important that the parents cooperate with each other, therefore the court may also decide on mediation between the parents.

Is the amendment applicable to ongoing procedures?

The amendment of the Civil Code is only applicable to procedures started on or after the 01st January 2022. This means that for any procedures initiated before, the past laws remain applicable.

Summary

The amendment to the law itself calls for the court's decision-making power to be extended beyond the previous regulation, thus helping to ensure that the final decision is in the best interests of the child. According to the current legislation, the court can already decide on the joint exercise of parental custody at the request of one of the parents. Thus, the legislator has built a legal institution that is already relatively widespread in Europe into the system of domestic family law regulation, the effect of which can be observed from the judicial practice of the following years.

In case you have questions or need legal help regarding divorce or any other related family law cases, please contact our office. Our experienced experts are at your service!

In today’s modern legal environment, the documented and professional examination of digital evidence, as well as the protection of devices and user accounts, has become increasingly important in legal disputes and proceedings.

Our firm’s cooperating partner in this field is Biztonság Akadémia Kft.

The professional expertise of our partner is provided by Tamás Durmics, an independent IT security expert and ethical hacker with more than 25 years of experience in information technology and security. His work focuses on documented and independent examination methodologies, as well as on presenting technical findings in a clear and comprehensible manner suitable for use in legal proceedings.

One of the most common situations giving rise to the greatest number of conflicts during probate proceedings is when the deceased dies without making a testamentary disposition. In such cases, the fate of the assets and debts is determined by the statutory order of succession under the Hungarian Civil Code. Although the rules are clear, a significant proportion of clients are not aware of the more important changes introduced by the Civil Code currently in force, particularly with regard to the rights of the surviving spouse or the extent of the compulsory share.

Under the rules currently in force, the general rate of personal income tax (PIT) is 15 per cent of the tax base. In everyday language, many people lump the different concepts together and simply call every case in which no tax is deducted from their gross salary a “tax exemption.” From a legal-dogmatic perspective, however, classical tax exemption must be sharply distinguished from tax allowances. While tax-exempt revenues do not form part of the tax base in the first place, the tax system also recognises different rules that result in a reduction of the private individual’s tax: these are tax allowances reducing the consolidated tax base.

A particular characteristic of personal income tax is that these tax allowances and tax exemptions may be claimed only against income falling within the consolidated tax base and the tax thereon, and exclusively up to that amount.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence represents a landmark step in reconciling innovation with the protection of fundamental rights in the digital sphere. The Regulation’s primary objective is to improve the functioning of the internal market and to promote the uptake of human-centric and trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) within the European Union. At the same time, the Regulation attaches particular importance to ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights—including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection—against the potentially harmful effects of AI systems.

When enforcing overdue monetary claims, the time and cost involved in court litigation often act as a deterrent for the claimant. However, the Hungarian legal system provides a faster alternative that dispenses with the taking of evidence, known as the order for payment procedure (FMH).

This substitute for litigation, a simplified civil non-contentious procedure, is one of the most effective legal tools for enforcing claims, provided that the obligor does not contest the debt on the merits.