How did the law regulate custody before?

Under the past regulations – up until the 31st December 2021 – in case the parents did not come to an agreement, the court could only decide on parental custody for the benefit of one parent, even if after careful examination of the circumstances it became clear that joint exercise of parental custody would have been beneficial for the physical, mental and spiritual growth of the child.

Joint exercise of parental custody could only be decided at the request of both parents. In the event that one of the parents objected to joint parental custody, the other parent – who did not exercise parental custody – has usually been relegated to the background in making the decisions regarding the child. The only exceptions to this rule have been the major decisions regarding the child, which remained to be decided jointly by both parents.

What is alternate custody and what does it have to do with joint parental custody?

Alternate custody is not unknown in judicial practice, although it has not yet received a legal background before. Based on the agreement of the parents, parental supervision and contact arrangements have already been arranged in this way before, but the concept has now been clarified and enacted with the new amendment. Alternate custody means that the parents are jointly obligated and entitled to exercise parental responsibility for the same period of time, so they spend exactly the same amount of time with the child. Under alternate custody for example, the child spends one week at his/her mother, and then one week at his/her father. In case one of the parents gets to spend more time with the child – for example where the child spends two weeks at his/her mother and only one week at his/her father – that is no longer considered alternate custody.

According to the relevant laws, in case of joint exercise of parental custody, the court has to decide where the child is going to live, which address must match that of one of his/her parents. The court also has to decide on the time of contact arrangements – which include among others the time and place where the contacting parent can meet the child, contact during holidays, and child support.

It is also important to note that alternate custody is not a direct consequence of joint exercise of parental custody. Alternate custody thus remains as a mere opportunity, which may be decided by the court ex officio, if the court decides that it is in the interest of the child. Joint exercise of parental custody is the basis of alternate custody. Joint exercise of parental custody only means that the parents are obligated and entitled to exercise parental responsibility in equal measures, but this does not necessarily translate to equal amount of time spent with the child, which can shift in favor of one of the parents.

Which circumstances does the court take into account when making its decision?

The court must examine all the relevant circumstances before making its decision regarding the custody. According to the relevant laws the court must take into account especially: testimonies of witnesses, experts’ opinions, pedagogical opinions and environmental studies. In case of alternate care it is important that the parents cooperate with each other, therefore the court may also decide on mediation between the parents.

Is the amendment applicable to ongoing procedures?

The amendment of the Civil Code is only applicable to procedures started on or after the 01st January 2022. This means that for any procedures initiated before, the past laws remain applicable.

Summary

The amendment to the law itself calls for the court's decision-making power to be extended beyond the previous regulation, thus helping to ensure that the final decision is in the best interests of the child. According to the current legislation, the court can already decide on the joint exercise of parental custody at the request of one of the parents. Thus, the legislator has built a legal institution that is already relatively widespread in Europe into the system of domestic family law regulation, the effect of which can be observed from the judicial practice of the following years.

In case you have questions or need legal help regarding divorce or any other related family law cases, please contact our office. Our experienced experts are at your service!

Several amendments to the Civil Code entered into force on 1 March 2026. The need for these amendments arose from the demand to address practical problems identified on the basis of the practical experience gained in the application of the law over more than ten years since its adoption. The amendments rely on the results of the working group analysing the experiences of civil adjudication. In this article we present the most important amendments to the Civil Code.

As of 1 March 2026, a significant amendment has entered into force in Hungarian real estate law affecting condominium developments: the legislator has introduced a new legal institution, the Condominium Right of Improvement (társasházi építményi jog).

The new regime was enacted, inter alia, through amendments to Act CXXXIII of 2003 on Condominiums and Act C of 2021 on the Real Estate Registry. Its purpose is to provide a more structured and secure legal framework for purchasers in condominium projects under construction.

In this article we summarise the practical implications of the Condominium Right of Improvement for developers, purchasers and financing institutions.

Decree 2/2026 (II. 19.) KTM amends two existing legislative instruments: on the one hand, it clarifies the rules governing the allocation of topographical lot numbers (place numbers) to independent real properties; on the other hand, it introduces detailed amendments to the provisions concerning the fees payable for specified land registry proceedings, as well as for the provision of data from the land registry and from state basic data registers.

On 19 February 2026, Government Decree 28/2026 (II. 19.) was promulgated, introducing an important amendment to the implementing regulation of the electricity (Government Decree 273/2007 (X. 19.) – hereinafter: “Implementing Decree”). The purpose of the amendment is to ensure that inverter replacements carried out in connection with the Home Energy Storage Programme („Otthoni Energiatároló Program”), launched in 2025 and announced for 2026, do not result in unfavourable settlement consequences for operators of household-sized small power plants.

The Home Energy Storage Programme is a state aid scheme designed to promote the installation of battery energy storage systems connected to residential photovoltaic systems. Within the framework of the programme, households may apply for non-repayable grants, subject to specified conditions, for the establishment of energy storage systems.

In this article, we present the essence and practical relevance of the legislative amendment, as well as the legal framework within which inverter replacements and settlement-related issues must be assessed.

Government Decree No. 415/2025 (XII. 23.) on the amendment of consumer protection–related government decrees with a view to ensuring a higher level of consumer protection introduces substantial changes in the field of consumer protection as of 2026.

In this article, we briefly summarise those amendments which will be perceptible to consumers in everyday life and may be of particular practical importance from 2026 onwards.

Government Decree No. 415/2025 (XII. 23.) amends a total of six government decrees related to consumer protection.
The objectives of the amendments are, on the one hand, to strengthen consumer protection and, on the other hand, to reduce the administrative burden on businesses, while also ensuring compliance with EU law and legal harmonisation.