Investigation Committee Uncovering the Systemic Crisis of Child Protection

The establishment of the body was ordered by Parliamentary Resolution 19/2026 (V. 27.), while the election of its members was decided by Parliamentary Resolution 27/2026 (VI. 8.).

Objectives and Tasks of the Investigation

The primary objective of the investigation is to uncover the structural, financial, operator-related, and personnel crisis of the Hungarian child protection system. The committee's starting point is that more than 21,000 children live in specialized care, while the capacity shortage of the foster care network, underfunding, substandard infrastructure, shortage of professionals, and the inadequate functioning of the alert system severely jeopardize the safety of children.

Under the resolution, the tasks of the committee include:

• Investigating how operational deficiencies contributed to the overloading of specialized care and the emergence of conditions that endanger children's rights.
• Uncovering why cooperation among guardianship authorities, child welfare services, healthcare, educational, and law enforcement agencies, as well as institutional operators, was unable to prevent abuse and institutional vulnerability.
• Verifying whether the announced increases in state funding resulted in actual systemic improvement.
• Determining political, professional, or institutional responsibility, and making proposals for legislative measures to strengthen the system.

The resolution states that the task of the committee is not to investigate individual criminal or regulatory cases, but to identify systemic problems.

Investigation Committee Uncovering Those Responsible for the Pardon Scandal

This investigation was brought into being by Parliamentary Resolution 20/2026 (V. 27.), and the appointment of officers was provided for by Parliamentary Resolution 28/2026 (VI. 8.).

Objectives and Tasks of the Investigation

The objective of the committee is to uncover how the preparation of the presidential pardon decision, the countersign by the Minister of Justice, and the political and informal lobbying network operated in the Bicske pardon case, resulting in K. E. receiving a pardon. The investigation is based on the fact that, according to disclosed documents, the professional proposal and the position of the Minister of Justice originally did not support the pardon, yet the decision was made and became effective.

According to the resolution, the tasks of the committee are:

• To examine whether the institutional and procedural framework of pardon decision-making complied with the requirements of the rule of law, transparency, and child protection considerations.
• To uncover the roles played by the Sándor Palace, the Ministry of Justice, government and party-political background actors, and external intermediaries in the process, and whether informal lobbying activities bypassing official decision-making preparation mechanisms took place.
• To determine the political, professional, or administrative responsibility for the anomalies, and to propose legislative guarantees that exclude political influence.

The body's task is not to reopen the court case or establish individual legal liability, but to clarify the decision-making chain institutionally.

Rules of Operation, Deadlines, and Guarantees of Transparency

Although these are two separate investigations, the National Assembly has established identical and strict operational and procedural frameworks for both bodies to ensure effective fact-finding.

Procedural Powers

Both committees are entitled to hold hearings and request official documents within their scope of duties. The resolutions lay down a binding obligation stating that everyone is required to make the requested data available to the committees, and summoned persons are obliged to appear before the bodies. The work of the representatives may be assisted by one expert per member. Members and experts shall not receive separate remuneration; operational costs are covered by the parliament's budget.

Deadlines and Rules of Publicity

The committees shall establish their own rules of procedure based on the provisions of the House Rules. The final deadline set for completing the work and submitting the final report is December 31, 2026.

As a general rule, the reports are fully public and must be published on the website of the National Assembly. The resolutions also include an important guarantee in the event that, due to political division, the majority required to adopt the final report is not achieved: in such cases, the proposed draft report, along with the written comments and dissenting opinions made by committee members, must be made public together on a mandatory basis.

Divorce can raise significant questions not only in personal life but also regarding the future of a business. This is particularly true when one spouse owns a company or when the spouses have built a business together during their marriage. In such cases, an important question arises: if the company is registered in only one spouse’s name, can the other spouse claim a share of its value?

The answer depends on several factors, including when and how the business interest was acquired, the period during which the spouses’ marital community of property existed, and whether joint marital assets were used to finance the business.

When transferring a high-value property, the key question is not only under which legal title the property can be acquired, but also what tax or duty consequences arise from the chosen legal arrangement. This is particularly relevant where the acquirer does not fall within the scope of persons exempt from inheritance or gift duty. This raises an important question: which legal arrangement – inheritance, gift, maintenance agreement, inheritance contract or trust – may result in the lowest duty burden?

Notice: This article does not constitute legal advisory services, and does not necessarily match the interpretation of the applicable laws by the authorities. This article is for general information only.

In today’s modern legal environment, the documented and professional examination of digital evidence, as well as the protection of devices and user accounts, has become increasingly important in legal disputes and proceedings.

Our firm’s cooperating partner in this field is Biztonság Akadémia Kft.

The professional expertise of our partner is provided by Tamás Durmics, an independent IT security expert and ethical hacker with more than 25 years of experience in information technology and security. His work focuses on documented and independent examination methodologies, as well as on presenting technical findings in a clear and comprehensible manner suitable for use in legal proceedings.

One of the most common situations giving rise to the greatest number of conflicts during probate proceedings is when the deceased dies without making a testamentary disposition. In such cases, the fate of the assets and debts is determined by the statutory order of succession under the Hungarian Civil Code. Although the rules are clear, a significant proportion of clients are not aware of the more important changes introduced by the Civil Code currently in force, particularly with regard to the rights of the surviving spouse or the extent of the compulsory share.

Under the rules currently in force, the general rate of personal income tax (PIT) is 15 per cent of the tax base. In everyday language, many people lump the different concepts together and simply call every case in which no tax is deducted from their gross salary a “tax exemption.” From a legal-dogmatic perspective, however, classical tax exemption must be sharply distinguished from tax allowances. While tax-exempt revenues do not form part of the tax base in the first place, the tax system also recognises different rules that result in a reduction of the private individual’s tax: these are tax allowances reducing the consolidated tax base.

A particular characteristic of personal income tax is that these tax allowances and tax exemptions may be claimed only against income falling within the consolidated tax base and the tax thereon, and exclusively up to that amount.